
Owner's Guides
Home Care Agencies for Sale: Selling a Home Health Agency
Who is buying US home care and home health agencies in 2026, what they pay, and how the sale process actually works, including CMS transfer rules.
Demand is structural. Value is operational.
If you're searching "home care agency for sale" or "home health care agencies for sale," you're probably trying to answer one question first: is anyone actually buying, and what would they pay for mine. The answer is yes, more actively than most owners assume. Capstone Partners counted 104 announced or completed US home care-sector transactions in 2025, up 40.5% year over year, with strategic buyers closing 61 of them and private equity closing 43. But "home care" and "home health" are not the same business to a buyer, and confusing the two before you talk to anyone is the fastest way to price your agency wrong.
Home care means non-medical personal assistance, paid privately, through long-term care insurance, or through Medicaid home and community-based services. Home health means skilled nursing and therapy delivered under a clinical plan of care, billed mostly to Medicare. The license, the payer, the margin, and the buyer diligence are different for each, and this page treats them as the separate businesses they are.
01
Who Is Actually Buying
The buyer landscape splits into six categories, and each one wants a different size and shape of agency.
Individual operators and franchisees buy below roughly $500,000 in seller's discretionary earnings (SDE), usually financed through an SBA loan plus 5% to 20% seller financing. They're buying a job with upside, not a platform, and they pay accordingly: 2.2x to 3.6x SDE based on closed BizBuySell sales from 2021 to 2025.
Regional strategics buy $500,000 to $3 million in EBITDA in adjacent geography, often paying 4.5x to 7.0x EBITDA where back-office consolidation supports the price.
PE-backed tuck-ins target $1 million to $5 million EBITDA, or smaller agencies in a priority market, paying an estimated 5.5x to 9.0x EBITDA in cash plus a possible earnout or retention package. Expect deeper quality-of-earnings, compliance, and employment diligence than a strategic buyer would run.
PE platforms buy $5 million-plus EBITDA, multi-state or dominant regional agencies, at an estimated 8.5x to 11.0x-plus EBITDA, usually with rollover equity and continuing management. The headline number is the highest available, but rollover equity is illiquid and carries leverage and second-exit risk.
National public strategics and payer-owned buyers pay 7.0x to 12.0x-plus for strategically important scale, mostly in cash, but bring the highest antitrust and state-review scrutiny.
Search funds and independent sponsors target $500,000 to $2 million EBITDA at an estimated 4.0x to 6.0x EBITDA, with financing contingencies and a seller note or transition period built in.
Named platforms are active right now. Addus HomeCare closed a roughly $350 million acquisition of Gentiva's personal care operations in December 2024, on about $280 million in annualized revenue, and added Helping Hands for $21.3 million in August 2025. Help at Home, backed by Centerbridge and The Vistria Group, acquired Home Care Now of Central Florida in May 2025 and kept adding in Ohio and Indiana. Altocare, backed by Waud Capital, combined Senior Helpers with MedTec Healthcare in April 2025. HouseWorks, backed by InTandem Capital Partners and BPEA, has been building New England density through partnerships and acquisitions into 2026. On the skilled home health side, The Pennant Group paid $146.5 million for 54 divested locations in October 2025, BrightSpring more than doubled its home health and hospice footprint through 2025 divestitures, and Aveanna remains active in pediatric and adult home health and private duty nursing. Optum's $3.3 billion Amedisys acquisition closed in 2025 only after a DOJ settlement forced substantial divestitures, which is where some of Pennant's and BrightSpring's inventory came from.
02
What Buyers Actually Pay For
Price is set by adjusted EBITDA size tier and payer mix, not by revenue alone, and the two care models value differently.
Private-pay personal care runs from an estimated 3.5x to 4.5x EBITDA below $500,000, up to 8.5x to 11.0x-plus above $5 million, with the top of the range reserved for genuinely platform-quality agencies, not the typical listing.
Medicaid personal care, HCBS, and MLTSS agencies trade lower for the same size, roughly 4.0x to 8.5x depending on state reimbursement trends, wage mandates, MCO contract concentration, and EVV compliance. One waiver program or MCO above 40% to 50% of revenue is a discount trigger buyers will flag immediately.
Medicare-certified skilled home health carries the widest range: 4.5x to 10.0x at base, and 6.5x up to 12.0x-plus in a premium competitive process, where the premium requires mature transferable enrollment, clean surveys, and sound OASIS and PDGM billing controls. A valid, transferable certificate of need can add an estimated 1.0x to 2.5x EBITDA where it creates a real barrier to entry, but that premium disappears the moment the CON isn't transferable or the census is weak.
Two named public deals show revenue multiples at scale, for context: Addus paid about 1.25x revenue for Gentiva's personal care book, and Pennant paid about 0.77x revenue for its 54-location divestiture package, which was roughly two-thirds home health and one-third hospice. Neither is a general rule; both reflect the specific service mix and, in Pennant's case, a regulator-driven divestiture rather than a normal auction.
The Medicare-certified segment carries one more live variable in 2026: CMS's nationwide HHA enrollment moratorium, effective 13 May 2026, blocks initial enrollments and most changes in majority ownership that would require a new enrollment. A mature, already-certified agency becomes more strategically scarce under this rule, but the same rule can make a proposed deal structure uncloseable. Confirm before you sign an LOI whether your transaction requires an initial enrollment or a non-exempt change in majority ownership.
What actually moves the multiple
| Driver | Moves value up | Moves value down |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | EBITDA above $1.5 million with real management | Sub-$500,000 EBITDA, one working owner |
| Payer mix | Private pay, Medicare FFS, adequate MA/MLTSS rates | Single payer, weak Medicaid rates |
| Caregiver/clinician supply | High fill rate, low overtime, stable schedulers and DON | Chronic unfilled shifts, agency-nurse dependence |
| Referral base | No source above 10-15%, institutional channels | Owner-generated referrals, one hospital or lead source |
| Compliance | Clean surveys, strong Care Compare results | ADRs, UPIC/OIG issues, overpayments |
| Transferability | Mature CCN, clear CHOW path | 36-month rule exposure, moratorium exposure |
| Owner dependence | Administrator, DON, billing, sales already in place | Seller is administrator, rainmaker, and scheduler |
03
Caregiver Retention Is a Value Driver, Not a Footnote
Buyers underwrite fill rate, overtime, scheduler stability, and churn as directly as they underwrite EBITDA, because a home care or home health business is, functionally, a labor supply chain. An agency with chronic unfilled shifts or heavy reliance on agency nurses gets discounted regardless of what the P&L says, because the buyer knows they'll inherit the staffing problem on day one. Conversely, a documented high fill rate with low overtime and a stable director of nursing supports the upper end of every multiple range above. If you're eighteen months from a sale, fixing caregiver retention will do more for your number than almost anything else on this list, and it shows up in diligence within the first data request.

04
Deal Structure and Process
Enterprise value is set cash-free, debt-free, on normalized working capital delivered at close. Small asset deals typically fund 70% to 90% at close, with the balance in a seller note, earnout, or holdback; SBA-backed buyers may also require seller standby debt. Institutional deals commonly place 5% to 15% of value in escrow for 12 to 24 months, and rollover equity of roughly 10% to 30% is common, though not universal, when a PE buyer wants the owner to stay on.
A full process runs 6 to 12 months from readiness to close, and a clean, well-represented deal can close 60 to 90 days after LOI, though state review, payer credentialing, CON approval, and the 2026 moratorium can add months.
| Stage | Typical duration | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness and valuation | 4-8 weeks | Three-plus years of financials, census, caregiver metrics, SDE or EBITDA normalization |
| Regulatory structure screen | 2-6 weeks, parallel | License and CON review, CCN history, 36-month/CIMO and moratorium analysis |
| Compliance pre-audit | 4-8 weeks, often parallel | Claims sample, OASIS/EVV reconciliation, survey history, AR collectability |
| Confidential marketing | 4-8 weeks | Blind teaser, NDA, CIM, controlled data room |
| Management meetings and bids | 3-6 weeks | IOIs, bid comparison on cash, rollover, earnout, certainty |
| LOI negotiation | 1-3 weeks | Price, structure, exclusivity, working capital, escrow |
| Confirmatory diligence | 6-12 weeks | Financial, billing, clinical, legal, tax, HR diligence; purchase agreement |
| Approvals and closing | 4-16+ weeks | CMS-855A/PECOS, state CHOW, Medicaid/MCO consents, CON, lender approval |
| Post-close transition | 30-180 days | Patient continuity, payroll, EHR/EVV, credentialing, working-capital true-up |
For the full breakdown of how buyers translate these numbers into a valuation range for your specific agency, see our home care and home health valuation guide and use the valuation calculator.
05
Confidentiality Matters More in This Sector
Naming patients, caregivers, referral sources, or exact branch locations too early in a marketing process can breach HIPAA's minimum-necessary standard, destabilize your staff, and alert competitors before you've signed a term sheet. A covered agency cannot simply drop identifiable patient records into an open data room. The standard approach is a blind teaser, an NDA before any identifying detail is shared, and a staged data room that opens progressively as a buyer moves from indication of interest to confirmatory diligence. If you're an owner-administrator, this also protects you operationally: staff and referral sources finding out about a sale from a rumor, rather than from you, is one of the more common ways a good process goes sideways.
06
Taxes: Asset Sale vs. Equity Sale
Buyers generally prefer an asset purchase, because it delivers a stepped-up basis and lets acquired goodwill, licenses, and other Section 197 intangibles amortize over 15 years. Sellers generally prefer an equity sale, because it's more likely to produce capital-gain treatment on the whole transaction rather than a mix of ordinary and capital income from asset allocation. Asset and equity sales are also reported differently: an asset sale requires Form 8594 under IRC Section 1060, with a consistent purchase-price allocation agreed by both sides.
See our asset sale versus stock sale guide for the mechanics that apply across healthcare sellers generally. Regulatory continuity can push you toward an equity structure even if the tax math favors assets, because the licensed entity survives an equity sale and payer credentialing is less likely to require a full re-enrollment. That continuity comes at a cost: the entity's known, unknown, and contingent historical liabilities come with it. C-corporation owners should also model an asset sale followed by liquidation carefully, since it can trigger tax at both the corporate and shareholder level. And if you were counting on Qualified Small Business Stock treatment, don't: IRC Section 1202 excludes health-services businesses from the QSBS definition, so most home health and direct-care operating companies don't qualify. Get a structure-specific tax model built before you sign an LOI, not after the purchase agreement is drafted.
07
Common Mistakes We See
Treating a Medicare number as a portable asset. Billing privileges, the provider agreement, the legal entity, the state license, and CHOW rules all interact. A listing that says "transfer ready" is a claim, not proof.
Ignoring the 36-month rule and the current moratorium. A deal can sign and still fail to preserve Medicare billing. Verify the initial enrollment date, every prior change in majority ownership, and whether your structure requires a new enrollment application submitted after 13 May 2026.
Pricing an owner-operated agency on platform multiples. Once you price in a replacement administrator, DON, scheduler, and marketer, purported EBITDA can shrink fast. SDE, not EBITDA, is the honest basis below roughly $3 million in revenue.
Assuming payer contracts follow the license. Medicaid enrollment, waiver certification, MLTSS MCO agreements, and Medicare Advantage contracts frequently require separate consent or recredentialing that a CHOW approval alone doesn't cover.
Underestimating labor exposure. Unpaid travel time, overtime, 1099 misclassification, and workers' compensation gaps can turn a stated margin into a post-close liability, and a buyer's diligence team will find them.
08
A Worked Example
Say your agency is a Medicaid-funded personal care business with $2.1 million in adjusted EBITDA, no single MCO above 30% of revenue, a documented 88% caregiver fill rate, and clean EVV compliance. That size and profile lands in the $1.5 million to $3 million EBITDA tier at 5.0x to 6.5x, which is $10.5 million to $13.65 million in enterprise value before debt-like items and a working-capital true-up. If instead one MCO represents 55% of revenue and EVV exceptions are frequent, expect the buyer pool to shrink to strategics willing to underwrite that concentration risk, and the applicable multiple to compress toward the low end of the range or below it.
09
FAQ
Home care is non-medical personal assistance, valued mainly on SDE for owner-operated agencies. Home health is skilled nursing and therapy under Medicare certification, valued on adjusted EBITDA with a much heavier regulatory transfer process.
Small owner-operated sales tracked by BizBuySell for 2021-2025 cluster between 2.22x and 3.63x SDE. Institutional agencies trade on adjusted EBITDA, from roughly 3.5x at micro scale up to 8.5x to 11.0x-plus for premium platforms, with skilled home health reaching higher in a competitive process.
No. A buyer acquires the provider entity or its assets and works through CHOW and provider-agreement rules. The 36-month rule and the 2026 nationwide moratorium can prevent billing privileges from conveying in specific deal structures.
No. CMS's change-in-majority-ownership definition captures stock transfers, mergers, and cumulative transactions whenever more than 50% direct ownership changes within the protected 36-month period.
Usually not. State Medicaid enrollment, HCBS waiver status, and each individual MCO agreement need to be checked separately for change-of-control, assignment, or recredentialing requirements.
Plan on 6 to 12 months end to end, with 60 to 90 days after LOI for a clean process. State transaction-review notices, CON approval, payer consents, and the current CMS moratorium can extend that timeline by months.
10
Next Step
If you're weighing whether to sell a home care or home health agency this year, the first useful thing to establish is which valuation tier you're actually in and whether your transfer structure survives the 2026 CMS moratorium and the 36-month rule. We work sell-side with owners of profitable home care and home health agencies across the size spectrum described above. Start a confidential conversation with our team, no listing, no broad marketing, before you decide anything.